<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jean Theory: Distressing the Social Fabric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theoryschmucks.com/2008/02/05/jean-theory-distressing-the-social-fabric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theoryschmucks.com/2008/02/05/jean-theory-distressing-the-social-fabric/</link>
	<description>poststructuralists take on everyday life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 03:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caprice New Designer Fashion</title>
		<link>http://theoryschmucks.com/2008/02/05/jean-theory-distressing-the-social-fabric/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Caprice New Designer Fashion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoryschmucks.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Hello I discovered your site by sheer luck, I was browsing Bing for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBUv00CCIv0/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;classic fashion&lt;/a&gt; when I found your website, I must say your site is very intriguing I just love the theme, its amazing!. I&#039;m in a bit of a rush right now to fully absorb your blog but I have bookmarked it and also signed up for your RSS feeds. I will be back when I free up some time. Bravo for a awesome website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello I discovered your site by sheer luck, I was browsing Bing for <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBUv00CCIv0/" rel="nofollow">classic fashion</a> when I found your website, I must say your site is very intriguing I just love the theme, its amazing!. I&#8217;m in a bit of a rush right now to fully absorb your blog but I have bookmarked it and also signed up for your RSS feeds. I will be back when I free up some time. Bravo for a awesome website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psydayLeway</title>
		<link>http://theoryschmucks.com/2008/02/05/jean-theory-distressing-the-social-fabric/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>psydayLeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoryschmucks.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Wow... very cool theme. I will write about it as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; very cool theme. I will write about it as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tess</title>
		<link>http://theoryschmucks.com/2008/02/05/jean-theory-distressing-the-social-fabric/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Tess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoryschmucks.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genghis Philip</title>
		<link>http://theoryschmucks.com/2008/02/05/jean-theory-distressing-the-social-fabric/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Genghis Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoryschmucks.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Sorry for how late I&#039;m getting back to this, I forgot to reply when it was posted.

You&#039;re absolutely right that there&#039;s -types- of destruction. While you&#039;re right that it seems unlikely someone would continue wearing a hosed pair of jeans out of inability to afford new ones (though it IS completely possible), there&#039;s a weird tension between &quot;acceptable&quot; distressing/destroying and &quot;fashionable&quot; distressing/destroying.

And getting away with wearing annihilated jeans really is an economic indicator. You&#039;ve got it on the money, pretty much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for how late I&#8217;m getting back to this, I forgot to reply when it was posted.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right that there&#8217;s -types- of destruction. While you&#8217;re right that it seems unlikely someone would continue wearing a hosed pair of jeans out of inability to afford new ones (though it IS completely possible), there&#8217;s a weird tension between &#8220;acceptable&#8221; distressing/destroying and &#8220;fashionable&#8221; distressing/destroying.</p>
<p>And getting away with wearing annihilated jeans really is an economic indicator. You&#8217;ve got it on the money, pretty much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gelf</title>
		<link>http://theoryschmucks.com/2008/02/05/jean-theory-distressing-the-social-fabric/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Gelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoryschmucks.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&quot;But jeans that are old and worn are often saggy, torn in inappropriate places, or too thin to look right. There’s a narrow pass between too-new and too-worn, and every pair of jeans needs to go through it...&quot;

Something I&#039;ve noticed is you can often tell someone&#039;s social class by how &quot;destroyed&quot; their jeans are.  Anyone walking around in a destroyed pair of jeans is either too poor to afford a new pair (rare) or has a white collar job.  Destroyed jeans are a way of saying &quot;I have a good job and I don&#039;t need the protection of a pair of work pants in my daily life.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But jeans that are old and worn are often saggy, torn in inappropriate places, or too thin to look right. There’s a narrow pass between too-new and too-worn, and every pair of jeans needs to go through it&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Something I&#8217;ve noticed is you can often tell someone&#8217;s social class by how &#8220;destroyed&#8221; their jeans are.  Anyone walking around in a destroyed pair of jeans is either too poor to afford a new pair (rare) or has a white collar job.  Destroyed jeans are a way of saying &#8220;I have a good job and I don&#8217;t need the protection of a pair of work pants in my daily life.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
